“Under the KHSAA policy, a student-athlete cannot compete if they have an unfair advantage,” Beshear said. “The KHSAA policy requires that a student-athlete who has undergone sex reassignment after puberty must take hormonal therapy in a verifiable manner and for a sufficient length of time to minimize gender-related advantages in competition.”
Though Beshear’s move represents a rare instance in which a Democratic governor had the chance to reject such a ban from GOP state lawmakers, Republicans passed the measure with veto-proof majorities and could potentially override his veto when they meet again in mid-April.
“An athletic activity or sport designated as ‘girls’ for students in grades six (6) through twelve (12) shall not be open to members of the male sex,” the bill states. The legislation says “sex” would be based on a “student’s biological sex as indicated on the student’s original, unedited birth certificate issued at the time of birth,” or an affidavit “establishing the student’s biological sex at the time of birth” that is signed by a student’s medical professional who conducted an annual medical exam for the student.
While sex is a category that refers broadly to physiology, a person’s gender is an innate sense of identity. The factors that go into determining the sex listed on a birth certificate may include anatomy, genetics and hormones, and there is broad natural variation in each of these categories. For this reason, critics have said the language of “biological sex,” as used in this legislation, is overly simplistic and misleading.
The bill would also have set up a similar ban for public and private Kentucky colleges that are “a member of a national intercollegiate athletic association.”
The debate over the inclusion of transgender athletes, particularly women and girls, has become a political flashpoint, especially among conservatives, who have claimed they are trying to maintain a level playing field for cisgender athletes.
“This law ensures that both sexes get the opportunity to play in a competitive and fair environment,” Republican state Rep. Ryan Dotson, one of the bill’s supporters, said earlier this month during debate on the proposal.
“I don’t want one single female in our state to lose a female sports title, a scholarship, nor the opportunity to play,” he added.
The NCAA has come out in opposition to such bans, saying last April that it’s closely monitoring them to make sure NCAA championships can be held “in ways that are welcoming and respectful of all participants.”
Last year, Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Mississippi, Montana, Tennessee, Texas and West Virginia enacted similar sports bans, infuriating LGBTQ advocates, who argue conservatives are creating an issue where there isn’t one.
LGBTQ advocates had urged Beshear to veto SB 83, with the Human Rights Campaign, one of the nation’s largest LGBTQ rights groups, saying that “Kentucky Legislators voted to deny trans kids who are simply trying to navigate their childhoods the opportunity and benefits that come from playing school sports.”
“During his governorship, Beshear has used the term ‘Team Kentucky’ as a catchphrase for the state’s shared values of civility, unity, and collective distaste for bullies. But the phrase ‘Team Kentucky’ in a state where a child is denied an opportunity to play the sports they love because they are transgender would be an empty slogan,” said Cathryn Oakley, the group’s state legislative director and senior counsel, in a statement after lawmakers sent Beshear the bill.
CNN’s Amanda Musa contributed to this report.